Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Are we still on that?! A court hears the Jackson/Timerlake wardrobe malfunction case.

Justin and Janet before the FCC, T.R.O.U.B.L.E! Sing it with me now...!

"Gonna have you naked by the end of this song!" The "OOOOH NOO ooops!" Super Bowl Fiasco of 2004! Yes over three dang years ago folks!
Ok so I remember this but it's not heavy on my mind. I LOVE Justin but I was sick at how he punked (did you see him on "Punked" by the way?? That right there shoulda told me he was a little soft) out like that when he was confronted. Then he kinda left Jackson to fend for herself. I woulda sent a bomb to his trailer for that one! Anyway I just can't believe how long it took this case to be heard or that they even care so much about it anymore. But I do understand they have to keep things regulated so mistakes OR planned events won't happen like this again or at least can be minimized. "The FCC Love The Kids!"
Story from AP Entertainment
PHILADELPHIA - CBS Corp. should not be fined for the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show that ended with Janet Jackson's breast-baring "wardrobe malfunction" because the stunt was both fleeting and unauthorized, a lawyer for the company argued Tuesday.
The network also accused the Federal Communications Commission of applying "mushy" and newly restrictive standards when it fined CBS $550,000 for the half-second of partial nudity.
"The FCC's new zero-tolerance policy has already had a chilling effect on the broadcast industry, particularly with regard to television," said Robert Corn-Revere, a CBS lawyer who asked a federal appeals court panel to overturn the fine.
Several third parties, including two former FCC chairmen who complained the agency was engaged in a Victorian crusade, filed briefs in support of CBS.
The agency, though, called CBS indifferent to the risk that "a highly sexualized performance" might cross the line.
The 90 million people watching the Super Bowl, many of them children, heard Justin Timberlake sing, "Gonna have you naked by the end of this song," as he reached for Jackson's bustier.
The scene capped a show that featured a crotch-grabbing performance by Nelly (whoo hoo Nelly, that's my little hood boi rite thur!) and steamy lyrics from Jackson and others.
The case is the second recent test of the federal government's powers to regulate broadcast indecency. In June, a federal appeals court in New York invalidated the government's policy on fleeting profanities uttered over the airwaves. The case involved remarks made by Cher and Nicole Richie on awards shows carried on Fox network stations.
In a footnote to that ruling, the 2nd Circuit noted that President Bush and Vice President Cheney have been quoted using such expletives.
FCC lawyer Eric Miller argued Tuesday that Jackson's costume reveal, although fleeting, was graphic and explicit. Still images of the moment in question soon made their way around the Internet.
"The idea of an exception for fleeting nudity flies in the face of common sense," Miller said.
CBS should have been forewarned, especially when Jackson's choreographer boasted four days earlier that the show would include "some shocking moments," he argued.
Corn-Revere said the network took many precautions, such as choosing Jackson and Timberlake over more provocative performers, reviewing the script, voicing concerns about ad-libbed remarks and applying a 5-second audio delay.
Jackson has said the decision to add a costume reveal — exposing her right breast, which had only a silver sunburst "shield" covering her nipple — came after the final rehearsal.
At the time, broadcasters didn't employ a video delay for live events, which was remedied within a week of the game.
In challenging the fine, CBS said that "fleeting, isolated or unintended" images should not automatically be considered indecent. The agency noted it has long held that "even relatively fleeting references may be found indecent where other factors contribute to a finding of patent offensiveness."
Miller also argued that Jackson and Timberlake were employees of CBS and that the network should have to pay for their "willful" actions, given its lack of oversight.
The 3rd Circuit judges didn't indicate when they would rule. The $550,000 fine represents the maximum $27,500 levied against each of the network's 20 owned-and-operated stations.
End story from AP Entertainment

No comments:

Post a Comment

That's what I have to say. So what do YOU think? I thrive on conversation and insight. Agree or disagree or digress and leave a comment and express thyself..